Actually he has nothing to do with it.
Did you quote him and italicise it and bold it simply to tell him Jesus didn't cause the mother to be like that?Jesus Christ............. .......
Jesus died for our sins and yet oglop shows no respect and blames him for these mothers' petty complaints
I think you are intelligent enough to know my true meaning. In case you missed it, I was objecting to using Jesus' name like this. It is unnecessary and disrespectful to those who follow the Christian faith.
Well, I find it disrespectful that you believe in something that says I'll be burned for eternity for not believing the stories that you believe in. I think most of us can agree on who is being more respectful here. You know, the guy who doesn't think you'll be tortured for all eternity? Just my thoughts on the matter. Jesus Christ.
That's if JC was even real. :O
CO2, You have every right to express your views. That said, there comes a point when it's not about expressing views, but rather taking joy in pushing people's buttons.
.Actually there is quite a lot of secular evidence that He did exist, Google is your friend there.
I tend to disagree. And googling for evidence says: There is no evidence he actually existed.Chances are, there was a guy named Jesus who existed in that time period but, can you show me tangible proof that he truly was the son of god, that he actually performed miracles, etc. 'cause ATM, google is proving the opposite of what you are claiming.
I'll grant you that it would possible to track the pregnancy of the woman Mary who's mentioned about three times in the Bible and to show there was no male intervention in her life at all but yet she delivered herself of a healthy baby boy. I can say— I don't say that's impossible. Parthenogenesis is not completely unthinkable. It does not prove that his paternity is divine and it wouldn't prove that any of his moral teachings were thereby correct. Nor, if I was to see him executed one day and see him walking the streets the next, would that show that his father was God or his mother was a virgin or that his teachings were true, especially given the commonplace nature of resurrection at that time and place. After all, Lazarus was raised, never said a word about it. The was raised, didn't say a thing about what she'd been through. And the Gospels tell us that at the time of the crucifixion all the graves in Jerusalem opened and their occupants wandered around the streets to greet people. So it seems resurrection was something of a banality at the time. Not all of those people clearly were divinely conceived. So I'll give you all the miracles and you'll still be left exactly where you are now, holding an empty sack.
. I'll just point out, that while I am non-religious, I do believe that if the Jesus from the bible was an actual person that was the son of god etc. That he does have my respect.
Yeah it wouldn't be a smart move to diss someone you actually knew was the son of God
I'm not saying anything about Jesus Christ, the man. I'm using it the way people have been using forever. "Holy shit!" "What the hell!" "Jesus Christ!" It'd be like me telling someone to "F off" and them replying with the fact that they're chaste and don't do that kind of thing. It's being pedantic.