Read 2901 times

  • Jgrat
  • Super Waygook

    • 485

    • May 16, 2011, 06:14:29 am
    • Siheung


Re: Drunk bus driver in Daegu
« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2015, 09:21:34 am »
Quote
Police said the driver, surnamed Kim, 59, had a 0.0048 percent blood alcohol level.

Was he really drunk, or still just hungover from the night before?
Dropbox is the BEST way to coordinate files between home and school. Click here to get it --> https://db.tt/JSMXsrdm


  • Archeon
  • Expert Waygook

    • 773

    • August 21, 2012, 02:36:28 pm
    • Ulsan
Re: Drunk bus driver in Daegu
« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2015, 11:30:20 am »
yea... probably passed out at the wheel or something.
I will tolerate your existence only so far as it doesn't infringe on science.


  • matthewm12
  • Veteran

    • 123

    • August 31, 2011, 02:41:25 pm
    • South Korea
Re: Drunk bus driver in Daegu
« Reply #3 on: April 27, 2015, 01:46:36 pm »
actually I've ridden that bus many times...so maybe I'm gonna taxi for a while


  • CO2
  • Waygook Lord

    • 7104

    • March 02, 2015, 03:41:14 pm
    • Uiwang
Re: Drunk bus driver in Daegu
« Reply #4 on: April 27, 2015, 02:37:02 pm »
Quote
Police said the driver, surnamed Kim, 59, had a 0.0048 percent blood alcohol level.

Was he really drunk, or still just hungover from the night before?

Yeah, in a perfect world, it would be 0, but that number is ridiculously low. I'm confused. .048 would be too much, but .0048 is negligible.
ETA 2day 4hour 45min to next reboot.
DO NOT UNPLUG


Re: Drunk bus driver in Daegu
« Reply #5 on: April 27, 2015, 02:51:49 pm »
This is what happens when you live in a country with one of the world's highest numbers of drunkards. Not to mention the laxed regulations for safety.


Re: Drunk bus driver in Daegu
« Reply #6 on: April 27, 2015, 02:52:51 pm »
Quote
Police said the driver, surnamed Kim, 59, had a 0.0048 percent blood alcohol level.

Was he really drunk, or still just hungover from the night before?

Yeah, in a perfect world, it would be 0, but that number is ridiculously low. I'm confused. .048 would be too much, but .0048 is negligible.

Perhaps someone can explain it to me because I'm confused as well, how does .0048 count as drunk?


Re: Drunk bus driver in Daegu
« Reply #7 on: April 27, 2015, 02:58:46 pm »
경찰 조사 결과 운전자 김모씨(59)의 혈중알코올농도는 0.048%로 측정됐으며 경찰은 김 씨를 상대로 정확한 사고 경위를 조사하고 있다.
http://www.kyongbuk.co.kr/?mod=news&act=articleView&idxno=922281

or

그런데 문제는 경찰의 음주측정 결과 당시 A씨의 혈중 알코올 농도가 0.048%로 측정됐다는 점이다. 형사입건 수치인 0.050%에 미치진 않았지만 경찰은 A씨가 전날 과음을 하고 술이 덜 깬 상태에서 출근, 운전대를 잡았다가 사고를 낸 것으로 보고 있다.
http://www.imaeil.com/sub_news/sub_news_view.php?news_id=23264&yy=2015#axzz3YUSzC6h6




  • aemann
  • Veteran

    • 75

    • March 01, 2011, 05:41:52 pm
    • Busan
Re: Drunk bus driver in Daegu
« Reply #8 on: April 27, 2015, 03:04:12 pm »
Quote
Police said the driver, surnamed Kim, 59, had a 0.0048 percent blood alcohol level.

Was he really drunk, or still just hungover from the night before?

Yeah, in a perfect world, it would be 0, but that number is ridiculously low. I'm confused. .048 would be too much, but .0048 is negligible.

This article says .048.


Re: Drunk bus driver in Daegu
« Reply #9 on: April 27, 2015, 03:16:03 pm »
Quote
Police said the driver, surnamed Kim, 59, had a 0.0048 percent blood alcohol level.

Was he really drunk, or still just hungover from the night before?

Yeah, in a perfect world, it would be 0, but that number is ridiculously low. I'm confused. .048 would be too much, but .0048 is negligible.

This article says .048.

That's a more legitimate number.
Dropbox is the BEST way to coordinate files between home and school. Click here to get it --> https://db.tt/JSMXsrdm