Most people were not leaving for China. Most people do not want to go to China. And it is unrelated to money, or Korean spouses.
No they were. They told me so and showed me their pics in China. They did complain about the pollution sometimes though. But they also had some nice travel pics from around China. Much more diverse landscape too. Some also went back home as the economy got better and jobs began to open up pre covid. When I post something related to pay or wages on local Facebook groups and get more than 100 likes does show most foreigners are getting pissed and word is slowly spreading. For years it was spread the money was good here so folks kept coming over. Now word is slowly spreading the other way.
I have also had discussions with a few foreign hakwon owners who like the Koreans have become too complacent and developed shitty attitudes just because they think they can. They can afford to pay more but don't. Tells me what I need to know about a lot of people's character. Making 20 plus million won a month and spending and extra 1.5 million won a month to split between the Korean and foreign English teachers to give them both a fair wage is not too difficult. Especially where they are charging a lot more money. They claim "expenses" then clam up when I ask them what expenses. A lot of them have really shown a very flippant entitled attitude like "how dare you ask for a livjng wage". It's my right to "pay you low". I ain't no Marxist tear it down, but this really condescending "know your station in life" arrogant attitude coming off some of these foreign hakwon owners when you mention the pay is too low is a real eye opener. So, I am sure it is similar amongst Korean owners too.
Otherwise you can tell me how you got to making 4 million won a month. I am over 3 myself though. But I am at the ceiling.
I'm just telling you lots of folks went over and liked it.
Hankook, you have been told this many ways, from many different people. so ill be a simple and clear as possible because it seems that it hasnt gotten to you via other methods.No one here wants to go to China to teach.Please stop advocating for it.their reasons are mostly due to; government oversight, human rights abuses, current cultural genocide, their reasons are not due to; money.again. please stop advocating for china. if you want to go there, please do.
When you are saying that you are capped, what you mean is that you have reached the *highest basic pay scale*. There are definitely a number of threads where there has been discussion on ways to significantly increase one's EPIK income without breaking terms of contract etc!It takes a bit of networking, and a bit of luck, and definitely talking to the right people, but it *is* possible to make around 4 million a month without killing yourself, especially if you've lived here for more than a couple of years.Oh. Well, *that* I won't argue with. I thought you were insinuating that China was the *objectively* better choice for ESL. "Chacun a son gout" very much applies!
Even more people are *not* going over to China because they have moral reservations about working in a country that is actively perpetuating it's own version of ethnic cleansing, is following aggressive military expansion of its borders, and is gearing up for economic warfare with... well... basically "the West".Money is nice, but for many of us -- including those of us who aren't particularly well off economically -- there are more important things in life than earning a few extra bucks.Finally, as has been frequently discussed in earlier threads, there are still *plenty* of economic opportunities in Korea if one has the will to search them out. There is *no* reason why somebody whose primary reason for living in Korea is money should be making less than 3 or 4 million won a month, especially if they've been here for more than a handful of years already.
How many native Americans did Spain kill in Latin America? Are folks not going to teach in Spain now?
I didn't advocate for it. I just said there are options other than Korea. There's more than one option. You are always complaining about the wages here. How is that working out for you? Did you get a pay raise yet?
I didn't advocate for it.
You didn't advocate it?!!! Well, now you've just nudged VanIslander's "Sandra Bullock's career faded away after Speed 2" into second place for this week's most outlandish post. Advocating for people to go work in China has been your absolute obsession on here. And I love that after saying this "you don't get to equate your situation to theirs" you're still going around putting everyone in your shoes, except for the odd rich kid and waygook retiree.
I make 4.5 mil a month.
Impressive! How'd you pull that off?
Why do you have to attend a hagwon association? Is it a government mandate? Is it a mafia, come or we break your legs? I am still confused. I had a friend run one years ago and never mentioned anything about this group. Is it new? What makes it mandatory? Is it some collusion information session? Who makes them join? Sounds like a touch of communism to me. A free enterprise business must be free to do what it wants in these regards.
Maybe it's changed, but I was told it was "mandatory" at the 3 hagwons I worked at in Seoul over 5 years (2007-2012) and I never once went. There were zero repercussions. No docked pay, no verbal or written warning, not a curt word from management, and in fact I was renewed or offered renewals at each of these hagwons. I did go to the EPIK ones, but those were held during normal working hours and transpo was re-imbursed.
2.1 is soon to be minimum wage levels. http://m.kwnews.co.kr/nview.asp?s=501&aid=222062900149
2.1M a month is poverty. It is even lower after your deductions. I don't include garbage housing as a benefit. But if you are netting 1.8-1.9M a month after taxes, that is less than 24k a year in Canada or under 20k a year in the U.S.Truly disgusting.If you are one of these people who after studying for years to get a degree, and accept such an insulting offer, you only cheapen your value in the eyes of your current and future employers.