fascinating, but what does that have to do with this thread
I have a video of Bill Maher explaining why Americans should be less fat. Maybe that will help you understand better.
Stossel’s in good shape. Rides a bike to work. Age 74. Bill Maher’s also in good shape. Age 65. They’re not afraid of the coronavirus.
If humans were healthier, that’d mean less coronavirus. Good immune system = neutralizing the virus before it has a chance to replicate, mutate and spread. Catching it would be no big deal. People wouldn’t even know they’ve had it. How unhealthy are humans? VERY unhealthy. Imagine how many less deaths we’d have if people exercised a bit and ate healthier food. How many do that? Not many.
Just think how many lives could've been saved in places like Indonesia and India if people just heeded his message and simply got healthier.
Humans are stubborn and lazy. Try getting people exercise and eat healthier. They don’t want to. Which is why obesity is so high and growing in the world. Hopefully people can change for the better but the likelihood is slim. It’s an uphill battle… but worth the try.
Well I can't understand why the WHO hasn't got on board
They have. Hopefully people will listen. ___________________ ___________________ __
40% of deer tested in 2021 had covid-19 antibodies. In Michigan, 60%. Deer aren’t dying or suffering any ill effects. Why is that? At least part of it is they’re not sedentary and obese. They walk around and eat healthy food.
Why not both?I think some understate the importance of overall health to the COVID issue. I also think some willfully ignore the benefits of things like vaccines or certain social distancing measures and just throw out "health" because they're doing the equivalent of a kid who doesn't want to take a bath and throws a temper tantrum. But the fact is that sooner or later the bill is going to come due for all this economic disruption and that might well exceed the lives saved, especially considering the fact that the people whose lives are being saved often only have 5-10 years AT MOST left in them. Is it worth it to severely impact the lives of people 18-45 in order to add a few more years to people who basically are non-productive and in some cases outright invalided? And keep in mind the 18-45 are going to be responsible for the welfare of those most vulnerable, a massively increasing group. At some point you have to consider the question of sustainability and quality of life. That and human beings need to come to grips with the fact that yes, you are going to die.
Deer run free, why can't we?