Even with kids, the expenses don't outweigh the advantages of a double income -- or at least, they don't until it's time to enrol them in hagwons or university etc.Korea subsidizes almost *everything* child related.It's pretty awesome!
It's not only about the increase in expenses, but taking care of the child. If the grandparents can't help, then one parent must stay at home. Which means one income gone.
cant you just drop em off at daycare once they get old enough
Ok, if pay is really a concern consider this approach. Again, this is just advice.Get married! On the vast majority of ESL salaries a person who is single, indefinitely, is going to take a VERY long time to save up for any significant fixed asset. Consider spending less time scratching and haggling for better jobs and more time making yourself appealing and searching for a good spouse. The expenses only kick in once you start having kids and as long as you both stay fit and healthy you can postpone that for a while.2 level 1+ teachers with 2 housing allowances, 2 rural allowances, 2 multiple schools allowances and 2 big severance payouts will hit that jeonse in no time and be able to put a decent amount away every month. Teamwork, friends.
Lots of married guys here told me they have struggled and are frustrated with the lack of raises to the wages. Korea's getting more and more expensive. Everyone from bus drivers to factory workers have gotten raises while the ESL teachers haven't. Want to know who is respected and who isn't? Stay if you wish, but don't flame others who leave or eventualy leave.
Raising a family on one English teacher's salary would be hard. But he was trying to make a point about being married and having two people earning an income. That should be enough to live comfortably and save a decent amount. In his example, as rare as it might be, it's about 6.5m a month. And that's two public school NETs. A working Korean partner could have the potential to earn more.
And what happens untill they get old enough? It's also debatable what is old enough. I personally think that untill at least 2 years old, a mother ( or father) should take care of a child.
Both me and my SO work, and neither of us have family that live nearby.We stuffed our little gremlin in a (very excellent!) eorinijib at around 4 months of age. It's been a really good experience for everybody involved. YMMV, or course, but I feel that in our case, the day care experience has been so positive for us that we would do it again even if only one of us worked.
It's not easy to find a place that can take such small babies. Let alone finding a good one.
Lots of married guys here told me they have struggled and are frustrated with the lack of raises to the wages.
EDiK
really couldnt have gone with "every father in korea" and why is the mom one "mother" instead of "mom" it should either be mother/father or mom/dad REEEEEE