Trump permanently banned from twitter

i figure this prediction will go about as well as your "trump will reclaim the presidency" prediction went a few months ago

I am still waiting on that.  Cases are still being fought and winding their way through.  Lin Wood, Syndney Powell, and Mike Lindell amongst others haven't gone anywhere.  It was fraud and it was stolen.  Justice will come to the evil doers soon enough. 

I am still waiting on that. 

yeeeeeeeesh

"Trump to redefine social media as he plans his return"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_8t9l6izbQ

Wow, the decision to ban Trump could end up really backfiring on leftists. Imagine millions leaving Twitter to join Trump's social media site. I wonder what he'll call it.

it cant possibly worse than parler/gab so carry on i guess

Parler version 2.

Totally NOT a place for white supremacist terrorists to congregate and share their hateful views/terrorist plans under the guise of freeze peach...thereby totally NOT being a goldmine for the FBI, CIA, NSA and other intelligence agencies.

While your broader point is z valid one, I think your characterization as the place being a place for hateful views is based on a VERY subjective and politicized definition of hate, and the "planning for terrorism" is silly. No, millions of Americans won't be planning terrorism. That's like saying tik tokers are all Chinese agents or some shit. Unhinged.

ill be pretty impressed if it gets millions of american users

I think your characterization as the place being a place for hateful views is based on a VERY subjective and politicized definition of hate, and the "planning for terrorism" is silly. No, millions of Americans won't be planning terrorism. That's like saying tik tokers are all Chinese agents or some shit. Unhinged.

I have no idea what you're going on about.    He was saying the exact opposite of that. He even capitalized the "nots"! /s

While your broader point is z valid one, I think your characterization as the place being a place for hateful views is based on a VERY subjective and politicized definition of hate, and the "planning for terrorism" is silly. No, millions of Americans won't be planning terrorism. That's like saying tik tokers are all Chinese agents or some shit. Unhinged.

There, fixed it for ya 

You crossed half of it out, bolded the other half, left a comment, but left the typo in?
Triggered!

You crossed half of it out, bolded the other half, left a comment, but left the typo in?
Triggered!

If you read it with a german accent it makes sense.

I have no idea what you're going on about.    He was saying the exact opposite of that. He even capitalized the "nots"! /s

Is this sarcasm in response to his sarcasm?

I love how leftists and their media buddies were freiking out over a tiny minority of people who supported Trump went into the Capitol, but said nothing last summer when the far left tried to break into the White House and Trump was put in the bunker.  They burned a church and some other buildings nearby.  Yet, nothing was said and I don't remember Pelosi or Schumer being impeached.  But of course hypocrisy and double standards always come easy to them.  Remove Trump because he said some mean things to some women, but when their own Bill Clinton rapes women, nothing is said.  I don't recall any of them saying anything when He was actually the President.  When Meryl Streep and others in Hollywood knew about Harvey Weinstien's rapes they said nothing and called him a "god" but yet Trump had some locker room talk and of course they were all over that.  Of course Hillary Clinton was a friend of Weinstien's too.  The elites protect their own and the left is only against sexism or racism when it's from the opposing team. 

ah yes who could forget! the church they cleared with tear gas to set up for trump's photo op. that one is a classic

I'm of mixed feelings on it. On the one hand, Trump's photo op was awful and a utterly shameless.

On the other hand, the man should be able to walk to the Church without being set upon by a mob.

And also, yeah, you can't go "100% completely innocent protesters" to one group and then "COUP!!! INSURRECTION!!!" to the other. That's just blatant partisanship. To be fair, the right does it just as much. "ANTIFA is a bunch of terrorists trying to overthrow the government! and then calling people storming state houses in violation of protest permits "patriots". How about, I don't know moving in both ways. The protesters need to be civil and not lose their shit at the site of Trump, but they also shouldn't be gassed for a shameless photo op, even if Trump has the right to go to the church. And no, the people who stormed the Capitol were not part of any serious coup effort or an organized insurrection. It was a political protest that turned into a riot.

It's just everyone tries to go all out and declare the other side to be completely evil. Fing A, calm the F down (not you, the country I mean).

I love how leftists and their media buddies were freiking out over a tiny minority of people who supported Trump went into the Capitol, but said nothing last summer when the far left tried to break into the White House and Trump was put in the bunker.  They burned a church and some other buildings nearby.  Yet, nothing was said and I don't remember Pelosi or Schumer being impeached.  But of course hypocrisy and double standards always come easy to them.  Remove Trump because he said some mean things to some women, but when their own Bill Clinton rapes women, nothing is said.  I don't recall any of them saying anything when He was actually the President.  When Meryl Streep and others in Hollywood knew about Harvey Weinstien's rapes they said nothing and called him a "god" but yet Trump had some locker room talk and of course they were all over that.  Of course Hillary Clinton was a friend of Weinstien's too.  The elites protect their own and the left is only against sexism or racism when it's from the opposing team. 

Holy sh*t!  I agree completely with Hangook77 on something.  What about that lady who said all women should be believed when they accuse a man of something sexually inappropriate, but when speaking of Biden's accuser said that particular woman couldn't be believed?  I don't think the hypocrisy even registered with her. 

yeah they should just like nonviolently protest (jk that's also ultra unacceptable because they might like slightly inconvenience traffic or both me while i'm watching muh football)

but seriously i dont have anything against civil disobedience ore nonviolent protests by anyone (no matter how repulsive the people are. remember when the westboro baptist church was like the worst it could get? ha!). but all it takes is kneeling at football to get a large portion of the right's base frothing at the mouth

Holy sh*t!  I agree completely with Hangook77 on something.  What about that lady who said all women should be believed when they accuse a man of something sexually inappropriate, but when speaking of Biden's accuser said that particular woman couldn't be believed?  I don't think the hypocrisy even registered with her. 

Biden's too clueless outside his sniffing, kissing, and fondling of your women.  But you know, the women's groups have to follow the funding and shut up when it's their candidate lest they risk getting the money taps turned off. 

You crossed half of it out, bolded the other half, left a comment, but left the typo in?
Triggered!

I didn't want to be accused of revisionism!

Plus I crossed about 90% of it out ;P

Not that there's really any point in arguing this, but...

Are you aware that Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer didn't stand on a podium, whipping up a crowd with phony election fraud grievances, and then encourage everyone to go march on a church that subsequently got burned. If they had, you could probably make a like-for-like comparison. Since they didn't, you sound like a crackpot.

 

I do realize that they and other players like crazy Maxine were using divisive rhetoric for years demonizing Trump and his supporters including calls to harass them wherever they call and to 'impeach 45' from day one.  So, who is responsible for what?  Each individual is responsible for their own actions period. 

I know this'll trigger a bunch of you.  But here goes.

www.bitchute.com/video/FwX3oxjHqhE2/

 

I know this'll trigger a bunch of you.  But here goes.
www.bitchute.com/video/FwX3oxjHqhE2/

How dare you post a link without providing any kind of context! And you didn't even comment on what *your* opinion of the video is, or what it is that you'd have us discuss! What kind of savage are you??????    I can't even!!!!1!!