Ah, I misunderstood, then. I'd tried to take your advice and look at the situation with nuance and complexity. Therefore I didn't realize that Mr C, gogators!, waygo0k and Mayor Haggar were literally angry at statues and blamed them for society's ills. I assumed - foolishly, it would appear - that they took issue with what the statues represented, and what implications their continued public display had for regions marked by centuries of cruelty to black people.
I assume, then, that your mental illness diagnosis also applies to the removal of Stalin statues in the former Soviet Union, Saddam Hussein statues in Iraq, monuments to segregationists in South Africa and Pinochet statues in Chile.
AGAIN-Question-1) Do the U.S. intelligence/law enforcement agencies have the ability to find out who QAnon is and their identity?2) Why don't we know their identity?3) Shouldn't this be priority #1 if QAnon truly is responsible for a serious threat to our nation and encouraging an insurrection? Why the lack of urgency by the FBI? Why no Bin Laden or Unabomber-style manhunt? Why isn't the media trying to find out who Q is?Modify messageStrange how there are no answers or reply to this. Almost as if people know what the answers are and what that implies...
Wrongfooted again. I actually gave Demartino the benefit of the doubt and assumed that someone, at some point, must have made a comment that directly corresponds to these questions he's been shouting [at whom, it's never been clear].Alas...I dug back a few pages and found that he first started this in response to an article that gogaors! pasted. So first of all, it wasn't even an original comment from a poster here. Second, it's hard to see how one can extrapolate the ideas that he's demanding that someone [Who? We still don't know] defend from the chunk of text that he quoted. I'm gonna hazard a guess that that's why these probing questions remain unanswered.
... mainly that he's a nutcase ex-pat who until recently kept a pig farm near Manila named Jim Watkins, who runs 8chan now 8kun with his son Ron. Or it might be a tech guy named Jason Gelinas who ran the "drop" website QMap before it was shut down. Or it may be both or neither.I'm no expert, but I understand this kind of thing is very difficult to prove in the kind of way that makes bringing charges worthwhile. How do you know there's no "urgency" on the part of the FBI, BTW? You've examined the work logs?
No, not really. Debates about what to do with certain statues still continue in S. Africa. Young, contemporary Chileans have been responsible for a lot the momentum for removing Pinochet statues. Do you think that statue of Saddam Hussein that you mentioned was the only one in Iraq? When does the window of opportunity for removing them close, before people who want to do so receive your diagnosis of mental illness?
I'd suggest an implication is the understanding that the problem with QAnon doesn't relate to identifying an individual that is responsible for a wackjob theory.
Rather part of the problem is the large scale gullibility of the individuals and groups of retards like Waykook and yourself that buy into the stupidity of the conspiracy theories like a cabal of Satan-worshiping pedophiles running a global child sex-trafficking ring that was plotting against their clown prince.
The government can find you if they want to. They track down terrorist leaders in frickin Afghanistan with less info than this. If it's true like you say that QAnon was responsible for these conspiracy theories and is encouraging insurrection and treason, then he should be brought to justice and hunted down.But that isn't happening. There isn't a massive manhunt. People aren't looking for tips. There's no sense of urgency in the media.I think that tells you all you need to know about how real this "threat" is.
I answered your question honestly and legitimately. And it's not about finding, it's about proving, a much more difficult thing to do in the cyberworld.But you knew that. You are just intentionally not reading. And responding in a completely dishonest way. Go push your pathetic persona somewhere else.
you assume they want to track them down, my man. they break bread together, bro. 2 sides of the same coin, my dude. there's no political will to do it, my guy
Dude there's like 5 posts to respond to during break time. If I miss something just bring it up and I'll try to get to it. As far as proof, they're able to track down distributors of child pornography and other heinous crimes. And if Trump "knew what he was doing" then so did QAnon.Mr. C, you take politics wayyyy too personally.
This person, by your own claims, motivated people to engage in insurrection and treason. That should make them public enemy #1, yes?
There's no question, none, that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day,""The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president,"
You are such a lying dipsh*t Marti but at least you're acknowledging there was an insurrection, that much, at least, is progress.
QAnon is not a person. It's a dumbass conspiracy theory mouthed by dumbasses such as yourself.
i mean there are elected Qanon congressmembers so there being unelected Qanon intelligency servicemembers doesn't strike me as 2 nutty. and never underestimate the power of having a useful idiot (or a couple thou, i have no idea how many there are)
1) A person made the QAnon posts, hence some person somewhere is responsible for them. BY YOUR OWN DEFINITION that person should be considered the head of a bunch of insurrectionists and treasonists. So why isn't there a MASSIVE manhunt for this person?
liz Cheney: The President of the United States summoned this mob, assembled the mob, and lit the flame of this attack. Everything that followed was his doing. None of this would have happened without the President. The President could have immediately and forcefully intervened to stop the violence. He did not. There has never been a greater betrayal by a President of the United States of his office and his oath to the Constitution.
Mitch McConnel: There's no question, none, that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day,""The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president,"
2) marti: I have never espoused anything relating to QAnon. The fact that you think I have is due to your own crappy reading comprehension and inability to process information.
Please quote this definition that you claim I have made.
And streaming their terrorism live from the Capitol building was also 'making a smart-assed comment about the police being systemically racist'?
So your point is that the fact that people aren't exhibiting enough concern about their investment portfolio is evidence that a group of armed thugs storming the Capital building, killing a police officer, injuring countless others, chanting "hang Pence", going after the speaker of house and attempted to prevent the certification of election is not an attempted act of insurrection?
Did you see the cop at the end of the clip posing for a selfie with a Trump seditionist?
n the meantime just try to acknowledge what Mitch McConnel and Liz Chaney have said about the identity of the Jan 6th insurrection leader and stop with your half-arsed revisionism.
How many times have you brought up your deep state conspiracy theories about the Mueller investigation and how different are they to the bullsh*t QAnon crap?