Read 51962 times

Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #60 on: November 04, 2020, 11:34:02 am »
Daily Wire? Really?

You only have the intellectual capacity for an ad hominem? Can't engage with a Daily Wire article on any deeper level?

Sad!
Does your wife submit to you?


  • 745sticky
  • Hero of Waygookistan

    • 1914

    • March 26, 2020, 01:52:57 pm
    • Korea
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #61 on: November 04, 2020, 11:38:53 am »
Why can't you find me a reputable source to engage with?


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #62 on: November 04, 2020, 02:05:17 pm »
As opposed to armed MAGA heads trying to run a politician's bus off the road.
Police Dept. found that the Biden staffer vehicle was at fault.


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #63 on: November 04, 2020, 02:07:37 pm »
Daily Wire? Really?
Read the article. They're simply linking to a local news station which covered the story.

https://www.wfla.com/news/fbi-investigating-incident-where-trump-train-surrounded-biden-bus/

People, don't dismiss stories out of hand simply because of the source. This works both ways. Read the story and research it. Yes, sometimes the right/left-wing media is right and the other side is omitting things or barely reporting on them.



  • 745sticky
  • Hero of Waygookistan

    • 1914

    • March 26, 2020, 01:52:57 pm
    • Korea
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #64 on: November 04, 2020, 02:41:52 pm »
Police Dept. found that the Biden staffer vehicle was at fault.

"The police department also said it has researched the crash and watched online video. It said the “at-fault vehicle” may be the Biden-Harris staffer’s car, while the “victim” appears to be one of the Trump vehicles."


  • VanIslander
  • Moderator LVL 1

    • 3041

    • June 02, 2011, 10:12:19 am
    • Seogwipo, Jeju Island
    more
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #65 on: November 04, 2020, 04:17:57 pm »
Be careful!

Democrats are likely to throw their lattes!


  • waygo0k
  • The Legend

    • 4595

    • September 27, 2011, 11:51:01 am
    • Chungnam
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #66 on: November 04, 2020, 07:30:16 pm »
At fault in what context? Victim in what context?

Sounds like someone is trying to use out of context road/insurance rules to paint a pretty little picture.

Funny how the same people who defended the kenosha shooter becauae "self defense" are now touting "at fault" and "victim".

Goalposts 101.


  • L I
  • Waygook Lord

    • 7175

    • October 03, 2011, 01:50:58 pm
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #67 on: November 04, 2020, 07:33:20 pm »
Trump declared himself the winner and without evidence claimed fraud (as he had done before without evidence). Might lead to violence if enough people believe it.


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #68 on: November 05, 2020, 07:15:18 am »
At fault in what context? Victim in what context?

Sounds like someone is trying to use out of context road/insurance rules to paint a pretty little picture.

Funny how the same people who defended the kenosha shooter becauae "self defense" are now touting "at fault" and "victim".

Goalposts 101.

You might be right, but you ain't black.
Does your wife submit to you?


  • tylerthegloob
  • The Legend

    • 3063

    • September 28, 2016, 10:46:24 am
    • Busan
    more
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #69 on: November 05, 2020, 07:41:25 am »
You might be right, but you ain't black.

??????
more gg more skill


  • 745sticky
  • Hero of Waygookistan

    • 1914

    • March 26, 2020, 01:52:57 pm
    • Korea
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #70 on: November 05, 2020, 07:49:04 am »
You heard him Tyler. Hand over your melanin


  • tylerthegloob
  • The Legend

    • 3063

    • September 28, 2016, 10:46:24 am
    • Busan
    more
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #71 on: November 05, 2020, 07:55:50 am »
bbbbut i have so little to give
more gg more skill


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #72 on: November 05, 2020, 10:18:26 am »
Joe Biden is just one state (6 electoral college votes) away from being the president. And already Trump is asking for a recount in Michigan and Wisconsin? That just proves Trump is a crybaby man child brat. He even admitted that losing is difficult. Well, if that's the case, if he loses then I still say watch out because he did say that the transition will not be peaceful. If it means not being peaceful to a point that his hothead supporters cause violence, then Trump will have to look forward towards being charged as a war criminal. On the other hand, if not having a peaceful transition means acting out in his tantrums, everybody will just look down on him as just another sore loser coward, and move on, that's all. In that case it just proves that nobody will yield to his uncultured rhetoric because American voters have chosen not to let Trump's threatening words turn them around.


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #73 on: November 05, 2020, 11:32:43 am »
Joe Biden is just one state (6 electoral college votes) away from being the president. And already Trump is asking for a recount in Michigan and Wisconsin? That just proves Trump is a crybaby man child brat. He even admitted that losing is difficult. Well, if that's the case, if he loses then I still say watch out because he did say that the transition will not be peaceful. If it means not being peaceful to a point that his hothead supporters cause violence, then Trump will have to look forward towards being charged as a war criminal. On the other hand, if not having a peaceful transition means acting out in his tantrums, everybody will just look down on him as just another sore loser coward, and move on, that's all. In that case it just proves that nobody will yield to his uncultured rhetoric because American voters have chosen not to let Trump's threatening words turn them around.
Biden is potentially one state away (PA), but that 6 EV figure is based on Biden having AZ which FOXNews and AP called for him but NYT and others have not and Nate Silver is saying is premature.

MI and WI should at least be audited. Target Smart  had MI and WI early votes at pretty close distribution for Rs and Ds and the WI turnout looks way higher than every other state.

Will it change anything or is there any fraud? Cant make that call, but those things would at least warrant some kind of basic check for anomalies.


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #74 on: November 05, 2020, 11:38:38 am »
Gonna fact check myself on the last post. I'm hearing WI calculates voter turnout than everyone else and reports it based off registered voters, not voting aged population.

Come on WI, thats some New Hampshire type shit to pull and make yourself look special.


  • Mr C
  • The Legend

    • 3117

    • October 17, 2012, 03:00:40 pm
    • Seoul
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #75 on: November 05, 2020, 12:24:06 pm »
Biden is potentially one state away (PA), but that 6 EV figure is based on Biden having AZ which FOXNews and AP called for him but NYT and others have not and Nate Silver is saying is premature.

Or Nevada, right?  It is 6 EV ...


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #76 on: November 05, 2020, 01:03:01 pm »
Or Nevada, right?  It is 6 EV ...
Nevada is 6, but Biden should be 253, not 264. It's 253 without Arizona.


  • KimDuHan
  • Hero of Waygookistan

    • 1449

    • January 15, 2015, 11:48:59 am
    • Seoul
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #77 on: November 05, 2020, 01:18:58 pm »
It's not over yet, if Trump pulls Arizona and Nevada a riot might break out.

Trump votes are pending in Nevada and Arizona.

I believe Trump will take one of these states if not both.
« Last Edit: November 05, 2020, 01:20:36 pm by KimDuHan »


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #78 on: November 05, 2020, 01:47:35 pm »
It's not over yet, if Trump pulls Arizona and Nevada a riot might break out.

Trump votes are pending in Nevada and Arizona.

I believe Trump will take one of these states if not both.

Fixed


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #79 on: November 05, 2020, 05:57:56 pm »
It's not over yet, if Trump pulls Arizona and Nevada a riot might break out.

Trump votes are pending in Nevada and Arizona.

I believe Trump will take one of these states if not both.
That leaves him 5 short of 270, assuming he holds GA and NC.  Taking both without WI or PA or anything else is pointless. That being said, it would be important because if he can somehow get a bunch of votes tossed in WI, that puts him over the hump.

270towin.com people for all of your fantasy scenaaaaios.