Read 69617 times

  • Adel
  • The Legend

    • 2477

    • January 30, 2015, 12:50:26 am
    • The Abyss
    more
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #500 on: January 30, 2021, 05:48:16 am »
Lol, they're already trying to blame the Gamestop thing on Trump and Neo-Nazis. They're hoping that gullible saps like you guys will lap it up and turn on the people sticking it to the hedge funds and investors that own these media companies and buy the politicians that support them.

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/27/politics/gamestop-stock-surge-trumpism/index.html
https://twitter.com/NateWeixel/status/1354472248283967498


Maybe this will finally wake you up to what dupes you all have been because of the media and them blurting out "TRUMP!!!!" and "WHITE SUPREMACISTS!!!!!" You guys are like Pavlov's dog. Throw those things out and you just lap it up without question.


It's great that you included a link for one of your QAnon type rants. It would be even better if your link provided any support for your batsh*t craziness! :laugh:
But seriously, I suggest you get in contact with these guys.

https://seoulcounseling.com/
« Last Edit: January 30, 2021, 10:08:07 am by Adel »


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #501 on: January 30, 2021, 08:04:57 am »
Unfortunately for you, progressives in Congress have:

*voiced their support for the redditors
*called out actual trumpists trying to ride the bandwagon

Try harder.
Then why do you think the MSM is going down that route? Why is Bloomberg trashing them?


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #502 on: January 30, 2021, 08:06:59 am »
It's great that you included a link for one of your QAnon type rants. It would be even better if your link provided any support for your batsh*t craziness! :laugh:
Biden's Treasury Sec received 800k in speaking fees from one of the hedge funds.

But you care more about me.


  • waygo0k
  • The Legend

    • 4771

    • September 27, 2011, 11:51:01 am
    • Chungnam
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #503 on: January 30, 2021, 10:11:41 am »
Then why do you think the MSM is going down that route? Why is Bloomberg trashing them?

You're really asking why a media company owned and funded by a billionaire stock trader is trashing a group of regular people coming together to bankrupt multi billion dollar hedge funds?

Like...you're actually asking that question? ? ? ?


  • Savant
  • The Legend

    • 3812

    • April 07, 2012, 11:35:31 pm
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #504 on: January 30, 2021, 11:59:14 am »
Poor Marty can't use his analytical skills to work out why billionaire hedge funds don't like losing "easy" money for them.

No-one's blaming the whole Gamestop thing on Trump or Neo-Nazis; no-one is using that narrative but you.

Why are you alarmed that us anti-Trump folk aren't blaming him for this? Is your mind that f@cked up?



  • gogators!
  • Waygook Lord

    • 6628

    • March 16, 2016, 04:35:48 pm
    • Seoul
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #505 on: January 30, 2021, 07:36:05 pm »
Biden's Treasury Sec received 800k in speaking fees from one of the hedge funds.

It's called capitalism.


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #506 on: February 01, 2021, 10:59:51 am »
You're really asking why a media company owned and funded by a billionaire stock trader is trashing a group of regular people coming together to bankrupt multi billion dollar hedge funds?

Like...you're actually asking that question? ? ? ?
The same media that you guys lapped up everything they pushed about Trump.


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #507 on: February 01, 2021, 11:06:16 am »
Poor Marty can't use his analytical skills to work out why billionaire hedge funds don't like losing "easy" money for them.

No-one's blaming the whole Gamestop thing on Trump or Neo-Nazis; no-one is using that narrative but you.

Why are you alarmed that us anti-Trump folk aren't blaming him for this? Is your mind that f@cked up?


I literally post an article and verified tweet where they do that and you say it's only me.

They put out feelers to see if they could use the same smears but there was no traction so they moved on to a different angle. It's called A-B testing.


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #508 on: February 01, 2021, 02:53:24 pm »
"100% true." What nonsense. Hyperbole to support a lie.
It's 100% true your response to the Capitol riots was to get on here and argue with me.

You can't undo it.

Next time, if you're going to scream the sky is falling, make sure your actions line up with what you claim.


  • gogators!
  • Waygook Lord

    • 6628

    • March 16, 2016, 04:35:48 pm
    • Seoul
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #509 on: February 02, 2021, 12:44:22 am »
It's 100% true your response to the Capitol riots was to get on here and argue with me.

You can't undo it.

Next time, if you're going to scream the sky is falling, make sure your actions line up with what you claim.
1. I'm not arguing with you. That's a fool's errand. I'm pointing out your disinformation and lies.
2. Your hyperbole is as predictable as it is pathetic.
3. As for my response. I've done more than just shut down your lies here.
4. What have you EVER done about anything?


  • T_Rex
  • Super Waygook

    • 332

    • April 23, 2019, 08:10:20 am
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #510 on: February 04, 2021, 09:08:37 pm »
Where's the outrage about an unarmed woman at the protest being killed? The police officer who shot her is not being charged with any crime and his identity has been concealed.

"Both died at the hands of police and both symbolise a cause, but US patriot Ashli Babbitt is branded a 'domestic terrorist' after her death, while George Floyd became a martyr to millions and was buried in a gold-plated casket."
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/511931-ashli-babbitt-george-floyd-deaths/
"Racism is not dead, but it is on life support — kept alive by politicians, race hustlers and people who get a sense of superiority by denouncing others as 'racists.' "
- Thomas Sowell


  • stoat
  • The Legend

    • 2082

    • March 05, 2019, 06:36:13 pm
    • seoul
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #511 on: February 04, 2021, 09:24:09 pm »
Each case should be judged on individual circumstances, irrespective of the popular causes at the time. The races of victims and protagonists should either not be mentioned by the media or reported conistently across the board


  • gogators!
  • Waygook Lord

    • 6628

    • March 16, 2016, 04:35:48 pm
    • Seoul
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #512 on: February 04, 2021, 09:37:27 pm »
Where's the outrage about an unarmed woman at the protest being killed? The police officer who shot her is not being charged with any crime and his identity has been concealed.

"Both died at the hands of police and both symbolise a cause, but US patriot Ashli Babbitt is branded a 'domestic terrorist' after her death, while George Floyd became a martyr to millions and was buried in a gold-plated casket."
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/511931-ashli-babbitt-george-floyd-deaths/
She's not a patriot.


  • Savant
  • The Legend

    • 3812

    • April 07, 2012, 11:35:31 pm
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #513 on: February 04, 2021, 09:50:49 pm »
Where's the outrage about an unarmed woman at the protest being killed? The police officer who shot her is not being charged with any crime and his identity has been concealed.

"Both died at the hands of police and both symbolise a cause, but US patriot Ashli Babbitt is branded a 'domestic terrorist' after her death, while George Floyd became a martyr to millions and was buried in a gold-plated casket."
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/511931-ashli-babbitt-george-floyd-deaths/

Whereas, her casket, should be wrapped in a QAnon flag.


  • waygo0k
  • The Legend

    • 4771

    • September 27, 2011, 11:51:01 am
    • Chungnam
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #514 on: February 05, 2021, 03:56:41 am »
She's not a patriot.

"unarmed woman at the protest"

Hahahahahahahahahah ahahahahaha

If only she didn't play stupid games by trying to attack police officers and elected officials.

Where are the community leaders? The parents? Why can't they teach personal responsibility? This white on white crime stuff is just terrible. I mean, when 86% of white murder victims are killed by other whites, the officer just couldn't take any chances...especiall y with the proliferation of guns, drugs and terrorist propaganda within the white community. Besides, we should wait for all the facts before passing judgement. Have her toxicology report and criminal history been released yet?


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #515 on: February 05, 2021, 07:34:19 am »
"unarmed woman at the protest"

Hahahahahahahahahah ahahahahaha

If only she didn't play stupid games by trying to attack police officers and elected officials.

Where are the community leaders? The parents? Why can't they teach personal responsibility? This white on white crime stuff is just terrible. I mean, when 86% of white murder victims are killed by other whites, the officer just couldn't take any chances...especiall y with the proliferation of guns, drugs and terrorist propaganda within the white community. Besides, we should wait for all the facts before passing judgement. Have her toxicology report and criminal history been released yet?



Blocked users; your mom


  • stoat
  • The Legend

    • 2082

    • March 05, 2019, 06:36:13 pm
    • seoul
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #516 on: February 05, 2021, 08:31:08 am »
Well of course I 100% blame the patriarchy and systemic misogyny. Women have been oppressed by men for thousands of years. In fact the US was built on the oppression of females who have historically been underprivilged in all areas of life. They do the worst jobs they get the lowest pay, they suffer the most violence at the hands of men. They only got the vote 100 years ago. It's no wonder that poverty and systemic oppression lead some of them to turn to crime. Home life, parenting and personal responsibility have nothing to do with it.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 09:09:29 am by stoat »


  • Mr C
  • The Legend

    • 3927

    • October 17, 2012, 03:00:40 pm
    • Seoul
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #517 on: February 05, 2021, 09:21:53 am »
Well of course I 100% blame the patriarchy and systemic misogyny. Women have been oppressed by men for thousands of years. In fact the US was built on the oppression of females who have historically been underprivilged in all areas of life. They do the worst jobs they get the lowest pay, they suffer the most violence at the hands of men. They only got the vote 100 years ago. It's no wonder that poverty and systemic oppression lead some of them to turn to crime. Home life, parenting and personal responsibility have nothing to do with it.

Odd, isn't it?  Conservatives are just never funny, they don't "get" how humor works, somehow. 


  • waygo0k
  • The Legend

    • 4771

    • September 27, 2011, 11:51:01 am
    • Chungnam
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #518 on: February 05, 2021, 09:32:40 am »
Well of course I 100% blame the patriarchy and systemic misogyny. Women have been oppressed by men for thousands of years. In fact the US was built on the oppression of females who have historically been underprivilged in all areas of life. They do the worst jobs they get the lowest pay, they suffer the most violence at the hands of men. They only got the vote 100 years ago. It's no wonder that poverty and systemic oppression lead some of them to turn to crime. Home life, parenting and personal responsibility have nothing to do with it.

Please understand her unique situation...she was only fighting against the patriarchy by fighting on behalf of a president who grabs women by their pussies and a political party that uses religious doctrine to take away women's  reproductive rights.


  • stoat
  • The Legend

    • 2082

    • March 05, 2019, 06:36:13 pm
    • seoul
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #519 on: February 05, 2021, 10:13:25 am »
Quote
Quote from: stoat on Today at 08:31:08 am
Well of course I 100% blame the patriarchy and systemic misogyny. Women have been oppressed by men for thousands of years. In fact the US was built on the oppression of females who have historically been underprivilged in all areas of life. They do the worst jobs they get the lowest pay, they suffer the most violence at the hands of men. They only got the vote 100 years ago. It's no wonder that poverty and systemic oppression lead some of them to turn to crime. Home life, parenting and personal responsibility have nothing to do with it.

Please understand her unique situation...she was only fighting against the patriarchy by fighting on behalf of a president who grabs women by their pussies and a political party that uses religious doctrine to take away women's  reproductive rights

Interesting, so do you think if George Floyd had turned out to be a rapid Trump supporter, BLM would have disowned him? Or put another way, if Ashli Babbit had been a POC, would BLM be showing an interest? I guess they would be since they're apparently not a political movement.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 10:48:16 am by stoat »