Read 49248 times

  • Savant
  • The Legend

    • 2814

    • April 07, 2012, 11:35:31 pm
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #420 on: January 13, 2021, 07:05:23 pm »
Yes, the proportionate response to what happened is to declare it sedition and insurrection. Lets follow it up with some drone strikes and mass hangings.

The scumbags who beat the cop deserve felony murder charges. The people who brought guns into it with the intent to go after the cops deserve stiff felony charges. The people taking selfies and vandalizing? Charge them with unlawful assembly, criminal trespass, vandalism and larceny.

But is this truly about safeguarding the Republic or vengeance?

You tell us since you present yourself  to be more knowledgeable and experienced than the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff.


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #421 on: January 13, 2021, 07:13:44 pm »
You tell us since you present yourself  to be more knowledgeable and experienced than the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff.
You're right. The Joint Chiefs are infallible and their views on political and legal questions must be regarded as such by anyone not in a position of federal political power.


  • Mr C
  • The Legend

    • 3023

    • October 17, 2012, 03:00:40 pm
    • Seoul
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #422 on: January 13, 2021, 08:23:02 pm »
You're right. The Joint Chiefs are infallible and their views on political and legal questions must be regarded as such by anyone not in a position of federal political power.

Sadly, you can't even begin to realize how pathetic and ridiculous you sound here.  You're arguing against the Joint Chiefs, who never, ever get involved in this kind of thing.  The reason they are is because, read carefully, this was an armed insurrection against the United States.

No one, NO ONE gives a flying f*** about anything you have to say. 

Just a head's up, my old sparring partner. 


  • gogators!
  • Waygook Lord

    • 5245

    • March 16, 2016, 04:35:48 pm
    • Seoul
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #423 on: January 14, 2021, 12:38:11 am »
Question- As an American, in response to this, what actions or preparations have you and your family taken and is this widespread?

Also, how would you compare all of this to the Vietnam era in terms of tension and genuine chance of upheaval?
During the 60s and early 70s, no one was afraid of peaceful protests against the Vietnam War.  That's a complete red herring.

People were concerned about the potential for civil rights riots to become violent and of people like H Rap Brown.

I, like most people in the US, protect myself by not bringing up politics because the potential for a trumpist to become violent in response is real.  In DC before trump's insurrection,  many businesses in the vicinity had closed and boarded up their windows and residents were steering far clear of the area.

You don't know what you're talking about.


  • gogators!
  • Waygook Lord

    • 5245

    • March 16, 2016, 04:35:48 pm
    • Seoul
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #424 on: January 14, 2021, 12:40:27 am »
You do realize that if you turned off the news and its steady diet of fear porn, that is deliberately designed to addict you to its content by appealing to certain emotional sectors of your brain you wouldn't be nearly as concerned, right?

You also realize that for every parallel, there are like 10 reasons it is NOT the same right? Are you looking at the reasons its not or just focusing on one end like a stupid person? You aren't stupid, right?

At least 67% of America doesn't think we're in 1930s Germany. Heck many on the left think that's overblown. Calm the F down.
Give us your 10 red herrings. OK,  three can be false analogies.


  • gogators!
  • Waygook Lord

    • 5245

    • March 16, 2016, 04:35:48 pm
    • Seoul
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #425 on: January 14, 2021, 12:42:39 am »
That's what a coward does. 
You should know. You spend a great deal of effort supporting one.


  • waygo0k
  • The Legend

    • 4539

    • September 27, 2011, 11:51:01 am
    • Chungnam
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #426 on: January 14, 2021, 01:30:45 am »
Panic buttons were inexplicably torn out ahead of Capitol riots, says Ayanna Pressley chief of staff

Panic buttons installed in Ayanna Pressley’s congressional office were torn out before rioters stormed the Capitol last week, her staff have said. 

Sarah Groh, who serves as Ms Pressley’s chief of staff, was with the congresswoman when president Donald Trump’s supporters stormed the US Capitol building last Wednesday.

...

According to CNN, two US Capitol Police officers have since been suspended and at least 10 more are under investigation for playing potential roles in the riot.


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election-2020/capitol-riots-ayanna-pressley-panic-buttons-b1786678.html

But it was just a 'random' mob that happened to get a little over excited...yeah?



Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #427 on: January 14, 2021, 02:09:24 am »
Sadly, you can't even begin to realize how pathetic and ridiculous you sound here.  You're arguing against the Joint Chiefs, who never, ever get involved in this kind of thing.  The reason they are is because, read carefully, this was an armed insurrection against the United States.

No one, NO ONE gives a flying f*** about anything you have to say. 

Just a head's up, my old sparring partner. 
Again, you're overplaying your hand. Thinking like this is how we flew off the handle post 9/11 and invaded Iraq.


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #428 on: January 14, 2021, 02:16:37 am »
During the 60s and early 70s, no one was afraid of peaceful protests against the Vietnam War.  That's a complete red herring.
Dude, you have no idea what you're talking about. You had f*cking riots outside the Democratic National Convention in 1968. You had Kent State. You had mass protests after Nixon bombed Cambodia. Campuses across America were shut down due to a general student strike in 1970. You had people setting themselves on fire. You had mass civil disturbances that dwarf the BLM protests in scale.

This is a fart in the wind compared to that.


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #429 on: January 14, 2021, 02:21:55 am »
I, like most people in the US, protect myself by not bringing up politics because the potential for a trumpist to become violent in response is real.  In DC before trump's insurrection,  many businesses in the vicinity had closed and boarded up their windows and residents were steering far clear of the area.

You don't know what you're talking about.
Yeah, if there's a real socially unpopular opinion, its being opposed to Donald Trump. Never seen that.

And how many businesses were destroyed during his insurrection?


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #430 on: January 14, 2021, 05:02:05 am »
Guys just stop responding to him, it's what he feeds off of because he is a contrarian troll addicted to defending the indefensible. Just ignore him, don't engage with him. Just stay on topic and continue to discuss details about the fact that his side committed sedition and insurrection tried to assassinate members of Congress and the VP and killed a cop.


  • Mr C
  • The Legend

    • 3023

    • October 17, 2012, 03:00:40 pm
    • Seoul
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #431 on: January 14, 2021, 07:42:29 am »
Hey, look!  Waygook's turdburglar-in-residence thinks it was the protesters at Kent State who were violent.


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #432 on: January 14, 2021, 07:49:18 am »
Yeah, if there's a real socially unpopular opinion, its being opposed to Donald Trump. Never seen that.

And how many businesses were destroyed during his insurrection?

And how many cops were killed during BLM protests vs Trumpers "peaceful protests"??????


  • L I
  • Waygook Lord

    • 6983

    • October 03, 2011, 01:50:58 pm
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #433 on: January 14, 2021, 10:09:58 am »
At least four cops killed in the George Floyd protests. One cop killed in the Stop the Steal protests. How many deaths dues to the spreading of coronavirus during these protests? Not calculable.


  • T_Rex
  • Super Waygook

    • 253

    • April 23, 2019, 08:10:20 am
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #434 on: January 14, 2021, 10:12:29 am »
"Antifa & BLM turned every major city and state capitol into shitholes last year, torching small businesses, smashing windows, tearing down statues, looting & shooting with impunity.

"Don't talk to us about how America became a Third World country 'today.' "
https://twitter.com/michellemalkin

Dems and their double standards.



Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #435 on: January 14, 2021, 10:21:28 am »
"Antifa & BLM turned every major city and state capitol into shitholes last year, torching small businesses, smashing windows, tearing down statues, looting & shooting with impunity.

"Don't talk to us about how America became a Third World country 'today.' "
https://twitter.com/michellemalkin

Dems and their double standards.



We get it, you're a white supremacist who supports domestic terrorism.


  • Savant
  • The Legend

    • 2814

    • April 07, 2012, 11:35:31 pm
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #436 on: January 14, 2021, 10:23:25 am »
"Antifa & BLM turned every major city and state capitol into shitholes last year, torching small businesses, smashing windows, tearing down statues, looting & shooting with impunity.

"Don't talk to us about how America became a Third World country 'today.' "
https://twitter.com/michellemalkin

Dems and their double standards.



Your only standard seems to be posting racist content. That and the Nazi sign on top of it.


  • Mr C
  • The Legend

    • 3023

    • October 17, 2012, 03:00:40 pm
    • Seoul
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #437 on: January 14, 2021, 10:26:58 am »
At least four cops killed in the George Floyd protests. One cop killed in the Stop the Steal protests. How many deaths dues to the spreading of coronavirus during these protests? Not calculable.

Snopes disagrees with you ( https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/06/09/cops-killed-george-floyd-protests/ ) and I'll trust Snopes over you, unless you have a John Stossel video. 


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #438 on: January 14, 2021, 10:43:41 am »
Hey, look!  Waygook's turdburglar-in-residence thinks it was the protesters at Kent State who were violent.
Where did I say that?

I mentioned Kent State to show there has been no action by govt agencies at that level and how nothing during these times has approached that.

Do you think this whole Trump period has been worse than the Nam era? Seriously? Yet you lot are huffing and puffing like it is.


  • L I
  • Waygook Lord

    • 6983

    • October 03, 2011, 01:50:58 pm
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #439 on: January 14, 2021, 10:45:52 am »
That Snopes link is debunking a specific meme. I got the info here:
_________________

At least twelve police officers have been shot in the line of duty as riots and protests raged throughout the country following the death of George Floyd.

https://www.google.com.ph/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/12-police-officers-shot-during-100000431.html

A number of these police officers have been killed in the line of duty, including retired St. Louis police captain David Dorn, Santa Cruz County Deputy Sgt. Damon Gutzwiller, and contract security officer Dave Patrick Underwood.