Read 56543 times

  • Adel
  • The Legend

    • 2016

    • January 30, 2015, 12:50:26 am
    • The Abyss
    more
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #220 on: January 08, 2021, 07:51:44 am »
Because............... The FBI don't know these people personally? hahaha What?

So you didn't read the link then. I guess I should've posted  more pictures for you.  ;D
« Last Edit: January 08, 2021, 07:54:03 am by Adel »


  • CO2
  • Waygook Lord

    • 7846

    • March 02, 2015, 03:41:14 pm
    • Uiwang
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #221 on: January 08, 2021, 08:11:20 am »
So you didn't read the link then. I guess I should've posted  more pictures for you.  ;D

I'm confused. The one article is about one guy, Angeli, and the other about the BLM comparison.

If people get away from a crime, the police need help identifying who was there, whether it's photos or CCTV, composite sketches, what have you.


  • Mister Tim
  • Hero of Waygookistan

    • 1806

    • September 08, 2013, 10:33:54 am
    • SK
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #222 on: January 08, 2021, 09:03:05 am »
One of the people who invaded the capitol is a guitarist from a well-known metal band. I've known for a while that he's a hardline libertarian type (he cheered for Ron Paul back when that was still a thing people did), but I didn't realize his dipshittery had sunk to such levels. He's in one of the photos the DC Police have posted online asking for help identifying people for unlawful entry, and I know for certain that at least two people have already contacted them (and the FBI) to clue them in on his identity.

I'm actually pretty bummed, because he's one of the biggest influences on my own playing style. A release from one of his side projects was even in my top ten list for 2020, which will now be retroactively embarrassing. Never meet your heroes, I guess.







  • Adel
  • The Legend

    • 2016

    • January 30, 2015, 12:50:26 am
    • The Abyss
    more
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #225 on: January 08, 2021, 09:44:51 am »
I'm confused. The one article is about one guy, Angeli, and the other about the BLM comparison.

If people get away from a crime, the police need help identifying who was there, whether it's photos or CCTV, composite sketches, what have you.
It took me five minute to identify that guy. I'd assume the FBI might have more sophisticated and well developed skills than myself in the age of social media.  ;D
 I mean, they didn't try very hard to conceal themselves did they but I guess you're often confused by a lot of things
« Last Edit: January 08, 2021, 09:48:02 am by Adel »


  • CO2
  • Waygook Lord

    • 7846

    • March 02, 2015, 03:41:14 pm
    • Uiwang
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #226 on: January 08, 2021, 09:55:01 am »
It took me five minute to identify that guy.
How?


  • Adel
  • The Legend

    • 2016

    • January 30, 2015, 12:50:26 am
    • The Abyss
    more
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #227 on: January 08, 2021, 10:03:12 am »
How?

Ever heard of google? I mean Angeli doesn't dress like you're regular joe does he?  Correct me if I'm being a little presumptuous here. Do you have that kind of gear in your wardrobe?
« Last Edit: January 08, 2021, 10:08:26 am by Adel »


  • CO2
  • Waygook Lord

    • 7846

    • March 02, 2015, 03:41:14 pm
    • Uiwang
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #228 on: January 08, 2021, 10:14:06 am »

Ever heard of google? I mean Angeli doesn't dress like you're regular joe does he?  Correct me if I'm being a little presumptuous here. Do you have that kind of gear in your wardrobe?

Did you forward your findings to the FBI? Cuz if you didn't, what does it matter if you find out his name online? The guys a nut, let the police deal with it.

And no, I don't. haha


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #229 on: January 08, 2021, 10:50:39 am »
Not a coup, but certainly an insurrection.

 I donít condone the violence that happened in Washington, but its time for some government reform.

Texaschicken.


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #230 on: January 08, 2021, 10:51:10 am »
Someone needs to interrogate Matt Groening,   


  • Mr C
  • The Legend

    • 3400

    • October 17, 2012, 03:00:40 pm
    • Seoul
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #231 on: January 08, 2021, 10:53:26 am »
Not a coup, but certainly an insurrection.

 I donít condone the violence that happened in Washington, but its time for some government reform.

Texaschicken.

Uh.  We just finished voting the bum out.


  • CO2
  • Waygook Lord

    • 7846

    • March 02, 2015, 03:41:14 pm
    • Uiwang
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #232 on: January 08, 2021, 10:59:03 am »
Someone needs to interrogate Matt Groening,   
Gee, it certainly couldn't be this nutjob copying the character from The Simpsons to a tee, could it?

EDIT: That's just Groundskeeper Willy with some drawings over him.

Groening ain't a clairvoyant.
« Last Edit: January 08, 2021, 12:13:19 pm by CO2 »


  • 745sticky
  • The Legend

    • 2031

    • March 26, 2020, 01:52:57 pm
    • Korea
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #233 on: January 08, 2021, 12:07:28 pm »
Uh.  We just finished voting the bum out.
Well, there you go. Problem solved.

Since we don't have Trump to worry about, we're allowed to press Biden on issues now, right?


  • Mr C
  • The Legend

    • 3400

    • October 17, 2012, 03:00:40 pm
    • Seoul
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #234 on: January 08, 2021, 12:54:00 pm »
Well, there you go. Problem solved.
That problem solved.

Quote

Since we don't have Trump to worry about, we're allowed to press Biden on issues now, right?
Of course.  A few things will be easy, like stimulus checks, competent govt handling of the pandemic, some of the roll-back of Trump's disastrous federal land-raping, a sane head of education dept, AG that has a spine, etc.

Some things are perennially difficult because of Republican intransigence.

Speaking of which, this election cycle also solved the McConnell problem, at least for two years.   


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #235 on: January 08, 2021, 01:00:34 pm »
Gee, it certainly couldn't be this nutjob copying the character from The Simpsons to a tee, could it?

EDIT: That's just Groundskeeper Willy with some drawings over him.

Groening ain't a clairvoyant.

Wow the fact you answered that seriously and had to add an edit about groundskeeper willie makes it even better!

Thanks for the lolís :D !!!
« Last Edit: January 08, 2021, 01:02:17 pm by thunderlips »


  • CO2
  • Waygook Lord

    • 7846

    • March 02, 2015, 03:41:14 pm
    • Uiwang
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #236 on: January 08, 2021, 01:02:59 pm »
Thanks for the lolís :D !!!

You're welcome. :)


Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #237 on: January 08, 2021, 01:03:27 pm »
I'm sure a certain scumbag will be along soon to point out that there is nothing to see here. 

It was a false report they ran a correction


  • 745sticky
  • The Legend

    • 2031

    • March 26, 2020, 01:52:57 pm
    • Korea
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #238 on: January 08, 2021, 01:11:26 pm »
That problem solved.
Of course.  A few things will be easy, like stimulus checks, competent govt handling of the pandemic, some of the roll-back of Trump's disastrous federal land-raping, a sane head of education dept, AG that has a spine, etc.

Some things are perennially difficult because of Republican intransigence.

Speaking of which, this election cycle also solved the McConnell problem, at least for two years.
Personally my top 3 asks are Medicare for All (or something similar, he can call it Bidencare or whatever if he wants), reduced presence in the Middle East, and abolish ICE (replace it with something else if they must, but ICE is corrupt to the point you need to at least rebuild from the ground up).

I doubt we'll see much improvement on the first two if only because of the massive pharma lobby and the military-industrial complex. I do think there will be a return to Obama-era policies as regards migration, but I'd like to push for something a bit nicer than that. Interestingly enough I think that M4A-esque plans and reduced military presence actually flies with a significant enough amount of Republicans since a few of them will continue to model Trump and play at populism.


  • Adel
  • The Legend

    • 2016

    • January 30, 2015, 12:50:26 am
    • The Abyss
    more
Re: Potential for Violence
« Reply #239 on: January 08, 2021, 01:12:31 pm »


This one just lost his job . His employer did seem ike a natural fit though!  ;D

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/goosehead-insurance-fires-lawyer-for-role-in-capitol-breach