Quote from: SaintsCanada on March 08, 2017, 08:07:26 amLeading Putin Critic Warns of Xenophobic Conspiracy Theories Drowning U.S. Discourse and Helping Trumphttps://theintercept.com/2017/03/07/leading-putin-critic-warns-of-xenophobic-conspiracy-theories-drowning-u-s-discourse-and-helping-trump/Mandatory reading from the great Glenn Greenwald.You nailed it Adel. That is, you are a prime example of the sort of 'snowflakes' many of us refer to when it comes to political discourse. I'm disappointed however. You didn't call me a 'racist' or an 'Islamaphobe', which is a sure sign that even the most fainthearted, illiberal, self appointed guardians of public morality that Western universities produce are beginning to see that such accusations have no merit and do not win arguements. Congrats dear. :)
Leading Putin Critic Warns of Xenophobic Conspiracy Theories Drowning U.S. Discourse and Helping Trumphttps://theintercept.com/2017/03/07/leading-putin-critic-warns-of-xenophobic-conspiracy-theories-drowning-u-s-discourse-and-helping-trump/Mandatory reading from the great Glenn Greenwald.
Seems like wikileaks caused a bit of damage again
Quote from: maximmm on March 08, 2017, 02:39:57 pmSeems like wikileaks caused a bit of damage again First Trump calls out creepy Obama, then loads more evidence. NOW 100% CHANCE OBAMA SPIED ON TRUMP.That much is settled.
Source please.
Quote from: thunderlips on March 08, 2017, 03:43:17 pmSource please.Common sense. Legal proceedings will follow, but just like with Clinton judgements are made in the minds of the American people. He's done.
There's as much a link between Obama and spying on Trump as there is Trump being in bed with the Russians- that is to say a lot of innuendo, circumstance, coincidence, and little in the way of hard evidence as well as denials by most parties involved that either has taken place.
No, what Trump does is just make sh!t up.
One day, Americans will wake up and clean their house of any and all corruption. Actually, no - I doubt that will ever happen.
Do you think those extra 200 are going to make a big difference.
it is expected that the missile will have the ability to place the warhead in a suborbital trajectory (shorter than the circular orbit that is off-limits under the international agreement) and strike from literally anywhere, even from the South Pole. It forces the suspected enemy to build an integrated missile-defense system, which is extremely expensive, even for the United States. Moreover, the warheads will enter the atmosphere at hypersonic speed and move along a larger trajectory, maneuvering at a speed of 7 to 7.5 kilometers per second. Time of pre-launch preparation of the missile will be kept to a minimum: less than one minute after receiving the order.Russia also has the mysterious RS-26 Rubezh. Not much information is available, but apparently it is a modification of the PS-24 Yars, with the ability to strike at intercontinental and medium range. Its minimum firing range is reportedly two thousand kilometers, which is enough to defeat the American missile-defense system in Europe. The United States opposes it, on the grounds that deploying the RS-26 is a violation of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. But this claim does not stand up to criticism: the RS-26’s maximum firing range exceeds six thousand kilometers, which means that it is in fact an ICBM, not an IRBM.Given the evidence, the United States lags far behind Russia in the development of land-based ICBMs. The United States has one, to be fair very outmoded, ICBM: the Minuteman III, capable of carrying only one warhead, and the prospects of developing a replacement are very indistinct. In Russia, the situation could not be more different. Land-based ICBMs are being renewed on a regular basis—in fact, the process of developing new missiles never really ends. Each new ICBM is designed to penetrate missile-defense systems, which makes the EuroPRO project and Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (the U.S. antiballistic system for intercepting incoming warheads) ineffective against Russia in the foreseeable future. http://nationalinterest.org/feature/these-russian-nukes-are-better-americas-15926?page=2
From what I can tell, they are all making sh!t up. And given that there's no legit news media left in the States, all of the party lies are being fed to the general populace as being true. One day, Americans will wake up and clean their house of any and all corruption. Actually, no - I doubt that will ever happen.
Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman to CNN: ‘Stop Spreading Lies and Fake News’March 03, 2017 "Information Clearing House" - "iBankCoin" - Russia’s outspoken foreign ministry spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova, had some choice words for CNN — after being confronted by their reporters over the AG Sessions’ hysteria. In a prepared statement, she called the event ‘media vandalism’ and a ‘disgrace’ — suggesting the US media is down in the depths of depravity and deceit.She stated the American media had “cross(ed) the line far beyond the professional ethics and their competence. They accuse and judge by simply fabricating false information.”“I have a question: is it rock bottom, which the US media has reached, or is there an even greater depth for them to dive?” Zakharova said.“The things that the US media affords itself to report are just an attempt at… a total disinformation of the public in America and worldwide,” Zakharova explained, adding the US audience is, of course, the main target.During the exchange, which was caught on camera and posted below, she laid into CNN — asking them to ‘stop spreading lies and fake news.’https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KWFhCh5Vs8http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/46590.htm
If you were Russia, would you strike first or wait to be attacked?because everything America is doing, and has done since the Clinton administration- blatantly sends the message that... they are readying to attack Russia.
Its a similar story with the conventional weapons. Yes, the US has more absolute numbers of vehicles and bombs, but they are less advanced than Russia.I know that the American psyche cannot stand to think it is inferior to anyone in the world in anything...but...re ality is tough. Its ok to admit it. No biggie.Anyhow I can see we aren't going to agree on this.. so, can we return to my original question?If you were Russia, would you strike first or wait to be attacked?because everything America is doing, and has done since the Clinton administration- blatantly sends the message that... they are readying to attack Russia.
Quote from: Mr.DeMartino on Yesterday at 01:40:32 Trump is a liar and a con man.
Quote from Mr.DeMartino on June 14, 2019 at 02:28:07 Donald Trump is a lying sack of shit
Huh? That's how MAD works. The only way to win the game of Nuclear War is not to play.
Quote from: zorq on March 09, 2017, 05:10:31 amHuh? That's how MAD works. The only way to win the game of Nuclear War is not to play. Its not as simple as you think.Washington is building a missile shield and launchers in countries bordering Russia that when completed will eliminate the Russian defence, and also be able to strike Russian targets in only 5 minutes. Once that is in place, Russia will be rendered defenceless.Do you think Russia will wait for that to happen?Your leaders are putting you on a path to war with Russia. Putin has spoken about this danger over and over, they do not even report his comments in the western media.Watch this:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqD8lIdIMRo
Your leaders are putting you on a path to war with Russia.
its not so much the numbers but the superior technology and what it can do.Its a similar story with the conventional weapons. Yes, the US has more absolute numbers of vehicles and bombs, but they are less advanced than Russia.I know that the American psyche cannot stand to think it is inferior to anyone in the world in anything...but...re ality is tough. Its ok to admit it. No biggie.
I disagree with you about the purpose and capabilities of NATO's anti-missile programme in Europe, but I do agree that American politics seem to be promoting conflict with Russia (and vice versa). It's the same old brinksmanship that the world suffered through during the cold-war era. I had hoped that they had progressed beyond that, and for a while it seemed like they had. But now all this.
Hopefully Trump or someone like LePen can put a stop to this nonsense. Unfortunately the anti-Trump people are such gullible saps because of their Trump hate that they're lapping this stuff up.