When will Trump be impeached?

Russia carries out a chemical attack on ex-Russian spies in GB and President Trump STILL hasn't come out against an attack on our strongest ally.

Mr. D, care to comment?

Russia carries out a chemical attack on ex-Russian spies in GB and President Trump STILL hasn't come out against an attack on our strongest ally.

Mr. D, care to comment?

Let's make a prediction... Will it be 1, 2, or 3?

1. "Trump's supporters know that his alliances are only as deep as the personal flattery that foreign leaders are willing to lay on him, and that he makes dangerously impulsive foreign policy proclamations on the fly. Nobody forced Hillary to spend insufficient time and money campaigning in Michigan."

2. "Someone vaguely associated with Bernie Sanders has also been silent on this issue. Trump supporters don't care that they elected someone whose campaign was managed by a money laundering crook who indirectly worked for a foreign government trying to undermine American democracy. SJWs are really annoying on Twitter, you know. Stop comparing Trump to Hitler."

3. "Trump voters enjoy his amorality, his lying, his inarticulacy, his fawning over strongman authoritarians, his religious hypocrisy, his nepotism, his inability to hire and retain competent staff, and his constantly shifting policy positions because they might get lower taxes and a border wall. So I'm willing to reserve my judgment until we see how this thing plays out."

Russia carries out a chemical attack on ex-Russian spies in GB and President Trump STILL hasn't come out against an attack on our strongest ally.

Mr. D, care to comment?

He did say that pending American analysis of the intel, if it turns out to be Russia, he would condemn Russia.

What's he supposed to do? Boot out every Russian? Bomb Syria? Does no one stop and ask how things got this bad in the first place?

You are blind as a bat, man. I can't begin to name the people Trump blasts on Twitter (including foreign leaders) for the dumbest shit while Putin literally carries out a chemical attack on British soil and we've heard no such condemnation via twitter by the president. And yet you still make excuses.

If Obama was this weak in the face of Russian aggression he'd been eaten alive.

If Obama paid off a porn star he'd been eaten alive. P.s. that could be another way he could be brought down. Campaign finance laws were potentially broken. Not to mention the party of family values now,look up to a man who is the exact opposite of said idea.

If Obama was this weak in the face of Russian aggression he'd been eaten alive.

If Obama paid off a porn star he'd been eaten alive. P.s. that could be another way he could be brought down. Campaign finance laws were potentially broken. Not to mention the party of family values now,look up to a man who is the exact opposite of said idea.

Trump and Obama ran on different platforms and different promises. The Republican platform specifically excluded escalation with Russia. Maybe you are eager to go to the brink of war with Russia over South Ossetia, I am not. I really don't give a crap what Russia does in its sphere sort of outright invasion and conquering. People over there have a different rule system and way of getting things done.

Trump didn't run as Mr. Clean. He basically ran as a slimeball. That's why he gets away with paying off a porn star. Hr may not believe in Republican policies, but thus far he has shown he is willing to fight for them in a way that perhaps people who DID believe in it were unwilling to do.

Lastly, do you really buy the Obama as a Saint crap? I thought he was a good president, but lets face it, the man had no problem ordering drone strikes and using the government to do some really shady stuff. The way I see things, Obama and Trump are like a 'good cop, bad cop' kind of act.

If Obama was this weak in the face of Russian aggression he'd been eaten alive.

If Obama paid off a porn star he'd been eaten alive. P.s. that could be another way he could be brought down. Campaign finance laws were potentially broken. Not to mention the party of family values now,look up to a man who is the exact opposite of said idea.

Trump and Obama ran on different platforms and different promises. The Republican platform specifically excluded escalation with Russia. Maybe you are eager to go to the brink of war with Russia over South Ossetia, I am not. I really don't give a crap what Russia does in its sphere sort of outright invasion and conquering. People over there have a different rule system and way of getting things done.

Trump didn't run as Mr. Clean. He basically ran as a slimeball. That's why he gets away with paying off a porn star. Hr may not believe in Republican policies, but thus far he has shown he is willing to fight for them in a way that perhaps people who DID believe in it were unwilling to do.

Lastly, do you really buy the Obama as a Saint crap? I thought he was a good president, but lets face it, the man had no problem ordering drone strikes and using the government to do some really shady stuff. The way I see things, Obama and Trump are like a 'good cop, bad cop' kind of act.

In other words  a combo of 1, 2 & 3. (See Andyman above post)

good

Who cares? Obama would congratulate Xi or some Saudis if they came to power. I see nothing wrong with that. You gotta deal with the world as it is.

Don't forget that he make lulz on the twitter machine!

You do realize that pretty much every politician of both parties "colludes" with every regime under the sun save Venezuela and North Korea, right? It's called the 21st century global economy. You can drudge up "links" to Russian Oligarchs and Putin in anything.

You do realize that Chelsea FC and the Brooklyn Nets are linked to Putin, right? Is Saddiq Khan Putin's stooge because London approves an expansion to Stamford Bridge?

You do realize that pretty much every politician of both parties "colludes" with every regime under the sun save Venezuela and North Korea, right? It's called the 21st century global economy. You can drudge up "links" to Russian Oligarchs and Putin in anything.

Well this is an interesting new line of defense.   

All politicians colludes therefore it's only natural for Trump to collude with Russia presumably?

So does this mean you've officially dropped your "no collusion"chorus that chant in every other post?

You do realize that pretty much every politician of both parties "colludes" with every regime under the sun save Venezuela and North Korea, right? It's called the 21st century global economy. You can drudge up "links" to Russian Oligarchs and Putin in anything.

Well this is an interesting new line of defense.   

All politicians colludes therefore it's only natural for Trump to collude with Russia presumably?

So does this mean you've officially dropped your "no collusion"chorus that chant in every other post?

There's collusion and "collusion". If by actively conspiring in a detailed manner to affect the election? No. If by, both have converging interests and they get unsolicited support, then that's the case with everyone. Clinton Clearly the Chinese had a preference for Clinton. Heck the Russians have donated money to Clinton and paid the Clintons big bucks.That doesn't mean they were working together on the election.

It's really hard to sort out because of the nature of 21t century global interconnectedness.

Do you have a problem with FusionGPS receiving Russian intel to use against Trump and passing it along to the Clinton campaign?

Do you have a problem with FusionGPS receiving Russian intel to use against Trump and passing it along to the Clinton campaign?

Did FusionGPS engage in any criminal activity to acquire said Russian intel?
Did you have a problem when The Washington Free Beacon engaged FusionGPS to research Trump to begin with?

McMaster gone, replaced by John Bolton.  Get ready for a war somewhere (Iran) to deflect the attention away from the collusion inquiry.   

Time to polish up your exit strategies perhaps.

 http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/mcmaster-is-out-%E2%80%94-here-are-all-the-casualties-of-the-trump-administration-so-far/ss-AAozpB4?parent-title=mcmaster-to-resign-as-national-security-adviser-and-will-be-replaced-by-john-bolton&parent-ns=ar&parent-content-id=BBKzUaa&fullscreen=true

Trump is a one-man White House. He doesn't need advisers or staff.

Twitter and Fox News. That's all he needs to formulate policy.

Did FusionGPS engage in any criminal activity to acquire said Russian intel?
Did you have a problem when The Washington Free Beacon engaged FusionGPS to research Trump to begin with?

Is it against the law for Don Jr. to meet with a Russian lawyer who says she has incriminating evidence against Hillary Clinton?
Did the Free Beacon pass that information onto anyone currently in the government, prompting an FBI investigation, not because the information was credible, but for the purposes of politically discrediting a political candidate?

Who cares how many people he's hired and fired? Sometimes you only need people for a short time to accomplish something and then the atmosphere has changed and it's on to the next person.

Who cares how many people he's hired and fired? Sometimes you only need people for a short time to accomplish something and then the atmosphere has changed and it's on to the next person.

Which number is higher? The number of people he's hired and fired or the number of porn stars/playboy models he's banged whilst married?